Mr Chan Chun Sing, Government Whip in the current Parliament, and Member for the Group Representation Constituency of Tanjong Pagar, said that the motion by the Workers' Party to amend the
NCMP scheme to transfer the seat vacated by best loser in the last General Election, Lee Li Lian, to the losing candidate of its own choice
"must reflect the truth". This goes without saying. How can Parliament even entertain the thought of passing a motion that are lies? We are, after all, not a banana republic. Yes, the truth must be stated. But the amendments to the motion introduced by Mr Chan is hardly the whole truth, or the truth was not the only thing that was reflected. It contains, yes, some truth (more accurately, fact), but also opinion and innuendo. Consider the amendment that was inserted to the motion:
“...
regrets that Ms Lee Li Lian, having stood as a Workers’ Party candidate and received the highest vote share among all losing opposition candidates, has now decided to give up her NCMP seat to another candidate from her party with a lower vote share (FACT)
, contrary to the expressed will of the voters (OPINION + ASSUMPTION
+ INNUENDO)
. And that the WP supports this political manoeuvre to take full advantage of the NCMP seat (OPINION
+ INNUENDO)
, even as its secretary-general criticises NCMPs as just duckweed on the water of the pond (FACT + INNUENDO)
."
Given the many lawyers of high standing in the PAP ranks, it is regrettable that the party voted in this amendment as is. The Opposition and NCMPs (who are all WP members) wisely abstained over this vague and politically charged amendment to the motion.
As the saying goes, "All is fair in love and war", even innuendos and fiction disguised as fact and the "truth".
tsk tsk tsk.
